Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dspace.cvasu.ac.bd/jspui/handle/123456789/1912
Title: Comparison between Distal Paravertebral and Line Block Anaesthesia for Laparotomy in Goats
Authors: Yadav, Saroj Kumar
Keywords: Distal paravertebral anaesthesia, line block, goats.
Issue Date: Dec-2018
Publisher: Chittagong Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Khulshi-Chittagong-4225, Bangladesh
Abstract: Animal husbandry practices are available in Bangladesh as there are a lot of feed staffs found here. A farmer raises goats for financial benefit. Where is a huge demand of chevon in Bangladeshi market especially in urban area. Sometimes goat takes polythene with their normal feed or such other unfed feed staffs, ruminal inertia happens. In that cases, laparotomy needs to correct the problem out. The study was conducted for experimental purposes toward relating the probability and efficiency of two methods of local anaesthesia with lidocaine 2% for laparotomy in goat. A total of 10 goats experiencing laparotomy were divided into two groups where five animals undertook a technique consisting of an incisional line block and the other five undertook distal paravertebral anaesthesia. Laparotomy in goat is commonly performed due to the rumenotomy or sometimes for exploratory. In our study, two commonly used local anaesthesia methods were compared with the degree of difficulty and the amount of time and anaesthetic agent required. The reactions of the goats to incision of the various layers of the abdominal wall, abdominal exploration and surgical closure of the abdomen and the time for wound healing were evaluated. Both techniques required a mean of five minutes to complete but the line block method was considered more difficult than the distal paravertebral anaesthesia. After distal paravertebral anaesthesia, pain reactions to incision of the external oblique abdominal muscle were more severe, however, reactions to abdominal exploration and to suture, the two oblique abdominal muscles were significantly milder than after line block. Wound healing was significantly better than in line-block. Neither technique resulted in consistent and complete elimination of pain reactions in every patient, but overall distal paravertebral anaesthesia had better results than the line block. The analgesic effect of both techniques was improved by mild tranquillization/sedate before laparotomy.
URI: http://dspace.cvasu.ac.bd/jspui/handle/123456789/1912
Appears in Collections:Thesis-MS

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Saroj Final print CD.pdf1.74 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.